Over 59029
politifake

Homophobia Politics


CPAC - TOLERANCE HELL ! - Get ready to hand out the torches and pitchforks! Homophobia rules!


TAGS: lgbt portman cpac homophobia
Rating: 2.71/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

crankyhead - March 16, 2013, 6:41 pm
Fox, is there an echo in here, or do you carry one around with you, wherever you go?
foxrecon19d - March 16, 2013, 4:20 pm
Said the Obama worshipping sycophant who constantly whines about "government manufactured crisis"


Don't blame me for my politics. -


TAGS: tea party conservatives bible homophobia
Rating: 3.4/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

Zeitguy - July 14, 2014, 10:28 am
The power of the biblical force field.


Homophobia -




PROUD TO BE LOUD -


TAGS: loud proud whopper homophobia
Rating: 3.33/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

EmmaRoydes - July 12, 2014, 10:57 pm
who got all upset about that in the first place?
fauxnews - July 12, 2014, 10:38 pm
LOL
Zeitguy - July 12, 2014, 10:10 pm
Absolutely, after you eat it you immediately regret it and say to yourself "never again". And then go watch Fox or MSNBC.


HEAL THYSELF - Homophobia can be cured.




Take your homophobia and shove it -


TAGS: homophobia
Rating: 2.6/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

Renza - April 28, 2013, 5:55 pm
I think education is one of those things he calling societal decay
PapaFox - April 28, 2013, 5:51 pm
Most people on the left also value education. You might try it sometime - it's never too late.
Renza - April 28, 2013, 4:44 pm
Normal isn't typically an applicable term when it comes to generalizing humans. And to answer your question, it depends on how close minded of a view you have on the world.
ChadAllen - April 28, 2013, 4:20 pm
"Don't" expect me to call that normal I meant to say. The same with les***** (I don't care how h** they may be). So do those on the left actually believe in anything that doesn't require dead babies, queer love, & overall societal decay & degeneracy??
ChadAllen - April 28, 2013, 4:16 pm
So where exactly is the moral imperative again for me to be demanded to accept one guy looking at another guys hairy a$$ & seeing love & be expected to consider that normal? Go be queer all you want, no skin off my nose, but expect me to call that normal.


HOMOPHOBIA? - Take that, suckers!


TAGS: homophobia
Rating: 2.23/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

Renza - March 1, 2013, 8:07 am
lol, that is an excellent response. ty for finding this.


Derp -


TAGS: baltimore riots homophobia bill flores
Rating: 2.6/5

More politifakes by rebeccaolsen

calron - May 25, 2015, 9:12 pm
So you going to pretend to know things that you cannot and them talk about that instead of the subject. Seems like a repeating pattern with a certain group.
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 17, 2015, 9:08 pm
http://a3.img.mobypicture.com/4b7a0410140ce2fbbaaa01aa9f520073_view.jpg
fauxnews - May 17, 2015, 12:20 pm
NP ;-) http://tacitlabs.com/ebay/awaves/nopro.jpg
rebeccaolsen - May 17, 2015, 12:15 pm
Didn't see this until now :) Sorry doll.
fauxnews - May 17, 2015, 12:10 pm
Already one step ahead of you ;-) See #76272
rebeccaolsen - May 17, 2015, 12:02 pm
Is anyone buying this?
fauxnews - May 16, 2015, 10:16 pm
Word of advice: It's not much of a game when we can see your hand ;-) lolololol...It's over, Calvon. We're not buying it. But please feel free to just keep trying to convince yourself. It's your time you are wasting, not ours.lol Cheers
calron - May 16, 2015, 9:00 pm
Opps, I mean rebeccaolsen likelt took the poster as fact without vetting it. And now refuses to admit that he might not have meant what rebeccaolsen says he did.
calron - May 16, 2015, 8:24 pm
I didn't message you.
calron - May 16, 2015, 8:21 pm
Took it as fact and likely didn't vet it.Both his arguments are basically Equivocation and he resorts to personal attacks rather than admit to the big section of the quote that was cut that changes the meaning quite a bit. That was my point you missed.
rebeccaolsen - May 10, 2015, 12:48 pm
#76055 :) http://ajournalofmusicalthings.com/wp-content/uploads/Aw-shucks.jpg
fauxnews - May 10, 2015, 12:39 pm
...or move on to a subject you are more familiar with, like D&D. After experiencing a few of your CC "arguments" it is clear your expertise is "fantasy." ;-) Have a good one, mate. Cheers
fauxnews - May 10, 2015, 12:22 pm
P.S. The truth is, Calvon, we are not sure if YOU UNDERSTAND "basic argumentation".lol..You had your a$s handed to you by Rebecca last week. If I had to go into why, then that really is just sad, mate. You really should learn to quit while you are behind.
fauxnews - May 10, 2015, 12:17 pm
Also, while we're on the subject of your double standard, This - www.politifake.org/propaganda-climate-change-irony-politics-61745.html Wanna guess what Koch brother funded thinktank THIS "non-biased"(lol) picture came from? Rhymes with Fartland Institute
fauxnews - May 10, 2015, 12:13 pm
Heaven forbid. You mean, Rebecca shared a parody picture from a parody website? lol..Also, the dem.website wasn’t the source of that quote. The congressman actually said those words.Much better evidence for it was the article YOU inadvertently posted X-p
rebeccaolsen - May 10, 2015, 11:49 am
Hun, that train left the station a week ago, along with any dignity you had left. Necroposting FTL
calron - May 10, 2015, 2:03 am
So basically you do not understand basic argumentative techniques like applying a premise to another subject to show that it is not sound, and of course, http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017262841
rebeccaolsen - May 6, 2015, 5:32 pm
Speaking from personal experience? :)
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 6, 2015, 4:37 pm
and, clearly, has nothing whatsoever to do with addiction to welfare and subsidized housing
DebtToAmerica - May 6, 2015, 3:11 am
"the baltimore riots are a result of too many black kids growing up without fathers... clearly, marijuana prohibition has had its intended effect!"
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 2:28 am
So, you're done now? :)
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:56 am
Go troll somewhere else, maybe reddit.com will enjoy your persecution complex.
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:54 am
When you are bringing up "ice-cream" and "murder" and trying to incorporate million dollar words like "strawman" (which you clearly dont understand) in a debate that has nothing to do with ANY of those things,do u really expect anyone to take u seriously?
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:41 am
So plainly by these arguments that you never actually bothered to even acknowledge existed in favor of attacks and strawmanning he did not actually say what you claim he did.
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:40 am
That he talked about what may happen in the future when stating that he was talking about the past. What he actually blamed was "the breakdown of the family" and then stated that redefining marriage (including g** marriage) would make it worse...
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:37 am
You never actually showed me wrong, rather you a**umed two different statements meant the same thing and attacked me and spammed your argument to back itself. As it is you still at blaming murders on ice cream sales because they are linked and ignoring...
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:32 am
so sue me. :)
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:32 am
Not at all. Yes, there are only so many ways I can show you that you are wrong when you did ALL the work for me :) But watching your credibility self-destruct was fascinating in a train wreck sort of way,I couldn't look away.I have a morbid sense of humor
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:24 am
And in the place of reason we have the same old attack lines being spammed. In all your arguing in a circle rather than presenting anything valid.
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:22 am
In all you "argument" shows a lack of the acknowledgement of the concept of fallibility, in which you debate in a big circle without realizing you are using a**uming you are right to prove it so.
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:22 am
The mountain of excuses you're making and your contortionist level of spinning is far more embarrassing than your goof ever was :) Please,dont stop on my accord.It’s quite entertaining watching you do the denier dance.You're practically a whirling dervish
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:19 am
So you still going to a**ume that I didn't do something that I did actually do and then attack me for your own creation rather than what I have actually said. IUt proves to me how biased you really are, so you want some sause on that crow?
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:18 am
Ties like ice cream sales and murder rates means the same to you as blaming murders on ice cream sales. The fact that he spoke of possible future events means he was not speaking of past events, thus couldn't be blaming these riots on g** marriage.
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:17 am
All your spamming and lame red-herrings in the world won't change that, hun. You embarrassed yourself...big time. More salt with your foot?
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:16 am
I can use the word "blames" if you like. It's not like I did something dumb like accidentally posted an article without reading it that actually made the case for my opponent here. Would hate to be that guy right now.
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:14 am
actually says "GOP Rep. Bill Flores ties Baltimore riots to g.ay marriage." According to "basic debate", your evidence made my case for me. Ties, blames. What do I care? Splitting hairs.
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:14 am
Nope, you moved the goal post from, "All I ever said was the Representative blames the riots on g** marriage." to "My argument was/is "Flores ties riots to g.ay marriage". By basic argumentation...
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:13 am
My argument is "Flores blames riots to g.ay marriage". You disagreed, saying "it is more about the rise of single parent households in the black communities," but offered as proof against it an article that doesn't say that at all. The proof you offered
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:11 am
actually says "GOP Rep. Bill Flores ties Baltimore riots to g.ay marriage." According to "basic debate", your evidence made my case for me. Instead of conceding a minor defeat, you are going for the big blow out. Thank you. I like to win big :)
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:11 am
"My argument was/is "Flores ties riots to g.ay marriage"." Nope, you said "All I ever said was the Representative blames the riots on g** marriage." Moved Goal Post.
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:10 am
"Mr. Perkins argued that the government is “the last stop to fix problems,” and that the major issues today can be traced back to “the breakdown of the family, which the redefinition of would only accelerate.”" Tied without causation. QED
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:09 am
My argument was/is "Flores ties riots to g.ay marriage". You disagreed, saying "it is more about the rise of single parent households in the black communities," but offered as proof against it an article that doesn't say that at all. The proof you offered
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:08 am
d*** I suck as spell, he spoke of a possible future events rather that the riots, so you "blame" on what has happened contradicts statement directly.
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:07 am
In the article the rep says“You look at what’s going on in Baltimore today, you know, you see the issues that are raised there.And healthy marriages are the ones between a man and a woman." The article's title itself is"Flores ties riots to g.ay marriage"
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:07 am
Your argumentum ad nauseam is not going to make your failed reasoning any more valid. You didn;t even get the order right as he said about what could happen in the further rather what already happened.
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:05 am
and instead repeatedly attack me without bothering to address what I actually said in reb***al. I have tied ice cream sales to murder and if your argument is valid I must be saying that ice cream sales cause murder. As that is false so is your argument.
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:03 am
The article wouldn't have the headline "GOP Rep. Bill Flores ties Baltimore riots to g.ay marriage" if it was going then refute its own claim. You goofed up and are too proud to admit it
calron - May 4, 2015, 1:02 am
But you claiming a tie means a causal relationship, and my a***ogy shows that no it doesn't. And you have basically failed at even basic debate by saying that me challenging one of the required premises your argument is not a valid...
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 1:00 am
when the article itself actually said "[The politician] ties the Riots to Ga.y Marriage." And you are too pathologically proud to admit it. So this ridiculous meltdown over it as you try to recover from that :) Please don't stop. It's quite amusing
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:59 am
But we are not speaking about ice-cream sales and murder here. That's a false a***ogy.Any high school debater will tell you that. We are speaking about a politician who tried to tie the riots to g.ay marriage and you offered an article as proof against it
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:54 am
Both ice cream sales and murders increase with temperature. So they are statistically tied together. That doesn't mean that ice cream sales are to blame for murders as a tie itself doesn't mean a causal relation.
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:48 am
Nope, as by the quote from the article you ignored, he tied them without a causal link between the two, which you keep ignoring in favor of of spamming the same line over and over, or argumentum ad nauseam.
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:43 am
One another note, when I see Rep arguments like this, I wonder if they are actually a closet homo***ual covering by being against the parts of themselves that they feel undue shame over.
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:43 am
Again, I said, the congressman blames the riots on g.ay marriage. You offered as proof against that claim an article titled "GOP Rep. Bill Flores ties Baltimore riots to g.ay marriage” So the article is contradicting itself? Then why did you share it hun?
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:42 am
"Mr. Perkins argued that the government is “the last stop to fix problems,” and that the major issues today can be traced back to “the breakdown of the family, which the redefinition of would only accelerate.”" Tied without causation. QED
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:39 am
And while you persist in saying those two statement means the same thing, you ignore the argument that they do not in favor of attacking over using reason, while pretending to know what I think.
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:38 am
Nope, because they are two different statements which shows that you're actually beating a strawman that you refuse to let go of, unless of course you believe that ice cream sales cause murders because science tied them together statistically.
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:37 am
Either you are too embarrassed to admit your goof up or suffer from some disorder that prevents you from seeing that. Either way, I'm just using your words and your article. If you don't like it, you might want to look in the mirror hun. He's to blame :)
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:35 am
All I ever said was the Representative blames the riots on g** marriage. You then posted an article with the headline "GOP Rep. Bill Flores ties Baltimore riots to g.ay marriage" as proof against it, when clearly it is making my point for me.
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:32 am
Science tied murder rates to ice cream sales, but that doesn't mean that one causes the other.
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:31 am
Nope on both counts, still fake mind reading for the fail so you can avoid what I actually say in favor of spamming that attack b***on.
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:29 am
neither the title nor the article say what you wish them to say, not am I "indict it"
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:28 am
I can practically see your red-face from here hun :) Sweating?
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:27 am
So you once again pretend to know what I think and get it wrong to spam that attack b***on. He never once said that the riots where because of g** marriage and neither did I. You seem to be trying to twist the facts to match what you what to be true.
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:27 am
Again, u shared this article. I didn't. Why would you share an article with the title "GOP Rep. Bill Flores ties Baltimore riots to g.ay marriage" if you were just going to indict it? Maybe b/c the truth is you f*cked up and have to spin your way out?
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:24 am
Oh, I read the whole article child :) Now you are just lying to save face. Inside the article itself, Rep. Flores says,"And healthy marriages are the ones between a man and a woman." Flores also has a history speaking out on the subject of g.ay marriage.
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:23 am
The irony is that it sounds like you are describing your usual line of "argumentation" whenever you make an error. Do you want a shovel, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aciTdXoC8J8
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:19 am
Nope, I read the actual thing, you know past the headline. The headline doesn't say what you are saying it does, but you chose to ignore what I actually said on the article to spam the attack b***on yet again.
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:19 am
Pathetic. You are bull****ting now and too committed to stop. I don't give a sh*t WHY he blamed g.ay marriage. All I said is: he did. You acknowledge it. So does the article you posted.Funny to watch you now DENY your own article, denier. BAD SPINNING FTL
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:16 am
Then why did you post it then, sweetie? :) Take a deep breath.
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:15 am
So ts;cr? You said, "It is more about the rise of single parent households in the black communities" yet the article's headline is: "GOP Rep. Bill Flores ties Baltimore riots to g** marriage" So you are indicting your own article you posted?
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:13 am
Isn't funny how you a**ume what I did and spam that attack b***on. :P Try reading past the headline. Now how do you like you crow :)
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:12 am
But if you read the actual article, he is saying the g** marriage would make it worse, rather than blaming it on g** marriage. Thus he is baiting his followers with some red meat, rather than doing what you claim.
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:11 am
Salt with your foot FTW :)
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:11 am
Then there is the article's headline -"GOP Rep. Bill Flores ties Baltimore riots to g** marriage, ‘breakdown of the family’" You said, "Looks like I was right." Between all the bu.tton mashing and your meltdown, forgot to read your article hun? :)
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:09 am
First line of that article you posted - "Texas Republican Rep. Bill Flores suggested Tuesday that the ongoing unrest in Baltimore is largely due to the “breakdown of the family,” which he tied to the legalization of g** MARRIAGE.
calron - May 4, 2015, 12:06 am
Looks like I was right, http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/apr/30/bill-flores-gop-lawmaker-ties-baltimore-riots-to-g/ :P
rebeccaolsen - May 4, 2015, 12:01 am
ts;dc :)
calron - May 3, 2015, 11:53 pm
If there's not more to that quote than you supplied, then I would likely say it is more about the rise of single parent households in the black communities, with some baiting thrown in.


Republican Christian Extremism -


TAGS: homophobia indiana religious freedom law
Rating: 2.03/5

More politifakes by rebeccaolsen

rebeccaolsen - May 31, 2015, 8:31 pm
That is like saying Christians hate the skin color, not the person, or Christians hate the Judaism, not the Jew - both things the church also condemned at one point. Who needs evidence when we have you :)
OTC - May 31, 2015, 5:37 pm
Here's another point where you're wrong, christians hate the sin, not the person. Obviously, liberal colleges teach the opposite
OTC - March 31, 2015, 6:28 pm
And nothing says that more than defending one group if people by demonizing another group of people
rebeccaolsen - March 31, 2015, 5:11 pm
I knew what you were saying in your #sarcasmfail.But even a clock that is broken is right twice a day.Despite both #sarcasmfails,I enjoyed your two inadvertently correct statements(about natural consequences for ignorance).There is your "two" for today:)
Curlyrocks - March 31, 2015, 4:54 pm
Oh right, scientists said something complicated that most people don't understand so it must mean the doomsday is coming and it's all the fault of people we don't like or understand.
rebeccaolsen - March 31, 2015, 4:51 pm
:)
Curlyrocks - March 31, 2015, 4:47 pm
Nothing dumber than thinking an all powerful force such as a god would cause some huge wrath and punish people for their lifestyle choices. So why is it so hard to believe that the earth isn't going to burn us all for our energy wasting lifestyle?


PREV PAGE